philipcortes.com Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the philipcortes.com

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host philipcortes.com. Currently, hosted in United States and its service provider is Squarespace .

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called SSWS containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

about me philco's 1.9 cents about me philco's 1.9 cents top about me philco's 1.9 cents about me philip cortes co-founded meeteor.com . dual mba/ma from upenn. avid ideologist. this blog is my long winded startup post-mortem. sign up for blog updates! philco's 1.9 cents rss newer older wednesday jun 26 2013 hey orderahead - here's an idea wednesday, june 26, 2013 at 5:14pm philip cortes if you’ve spent some time in the bay area recently, you’ve probably noticed the plethora of “orderahead” cards, stickers and general branding that exists around cash registers. it’s impressive how many coffee shops sport their brand, right below yelp’s sticker. (their head of merchant growth, danny , is clearly killing it). part of me wonders how strong their engagement metrics are. i’ve been working out of coffee shops for a few months now, and not once have i seen someone come in and mention order ahead or pick up their order from order ahead. i’m clearly not the target demographic, however, so i’m a bad litmus test for how compelling the platform is. i do use seamless, so whatever value they add is going to have to be significant in order for me to accept the burden of switching. that having been said, however, they've raised a big round from savvy investors, adn their metrics seem to be impressive according to this techcrunch article - so i may be off on this one. idea a pain point i do have, however, is locking in spots at coffee shops for meetings. (i also have a similar pain point for locking in spots at bar counters for dates). in both cases, i find myself having to go to the location a good half hour early to just stand around and lock in whatever opens up. it sucks. that’s not a minute of my life that’s lost…that’s hours every week. i want a platform that lets me pay a little extra (say $5-$10), to lock in space for 2-3 people ahead of time. i’d pay for this tomorrow, as it would save me a great deal of time, and save me a lot of stress before my meetings and dates. small target demographic, i know, but i'd pay through the nose for this service, daily. they coudl also mark some spaces "order ahead" spaces with stickers, which would result in additional branding within the coffee shops and bars. people would wonder what that meant, and would download the app to figure it out. a bit of a hairbrained idea, but i'd use it! post a comment | 26 references | share article tagged order ahead , orderahead | in startup idea | email article | print article permalink tuesday jun 25 2013 why google glass will fail tuesday, june 25, 2013 at 4:02pm philip cortes google glass will fail. note: a lot of the ideas here came from a conversation i had with greg schlomoff . we were talking about the impact google has had on the world versus facebook, which lead to a conversation about google glass. call me short sighted, but i really don’t think there’s much of a future for google glass or the new pulse by withings. why you ask? well, that’s easy: google glass forces me to adopt a new device, instead of replacing an old one. i don’t wear glasses. i don’t carry a small 8 gram rectangular device to clip onto my belt. i carry a phone, i sometimes wear a watch, and i wear a belt. i don’t wear any bracelets, i don’t wear glasses. if you want me to start carrying a new device, you have to offer me an incredible value proposition, that none of my current devices offer. in the case of google glass, it does may of the same things my cell phone does, but it doesn’t replace my cell phone. if it made glasses better (for those who wore them), then it would have a significant value proposition for that demographic. problem is…people who wear glasses can’t wear google glass. the one demographic they could have gotten traction with, they cut out of their beta. it’s not a micro improvement on something we already use, it’s a completely new device. the iphone worked because it created an incremental improvement around the user experience of telephones. smart phones already existed, people were already using portable devices as joint telephones and computing devices. (ah, the ol’ palm pilot. i miss it at times). what apple did is it created a device that enabled you to interact with it in a differentiated manner (the swipe touchscreen), with a powerful user experience around their apps, their unique operating system. it even cannibalized a very important part of its business: the ipod. it effectively integrated the ipod into a the phone, and made it so we had to carry one less device in our lives. the iphone made what i already had in my pocket, so much better. if glass, or pulse, or any of these wearable device companies truly wanted to get early adoption, they’d focus on creating devices that replace any items i currently have. why not create a watch or a belt or belt buckle? i don’t buy the efficiency argument. the argument is that it will make it so i don’t have to pull out my phone every time i want to do something. fair enough. is that a really big pain point though? do i complain every time i have to pull out my phone to take a picture? no - i don’t. there have been maybe two occasions in my entire life where i missed a cool picture because i couldn’t whip my phone out fast enough. that opportunity cost doesn’t justify adding the burden of glasses to my face permanently. the feedback i keep hearing from people is that the user experience is awkward. the tilt your head back + voice command platform is disruptive, and somewhat antisocial. if efficiency was one of the maind rivers of adoption, they should have focused more intently on the user experience of glass. bad ux doesn’t translate to a more efficient platform, no matter how manys teps were cut. additionally, the cost of adding something to my face significantly outweighs the benefits of efficiency. it’s a physical barrier between the wearer and the world i feel this every time i talk to someone who has google glasses on. it’s hard to explain, but i feel like there’s a barrier between us - i wonder if they’re going to interact with glass at some point and do something in the middle of our conversation. it feels like they have their phone out, and they’re about to make a call, but are trying to talk to me at the same time - i’m not sure whether our conversation should be brief, or if i should be trying to meaningfully engage with the person. some people also seem to feel threatened by google glass. they wonder if they’re being recorded, and they feel like the tool could be used against them in some way. as greg put it, google glass is the equivalent of flying cars, we’ve had flying cars for some time now, but they haven’t been adopted. it’s one of those things that sounds cool to us nerds, but is wholly unpractical. now, you could argue that some of the arguments made above will simply go away as we get accustomed to interacting with glass (both as wear-ers and outsiders). i don’t think that’s right. i think the culmination of all of these negatives significantly outweighs the benefits glass adds to our lives, and that they will keep glass from being adopted. google glass will add a significant burden to my life, and it’s unclear what the advantages are. i’m going to look weird. i don’t wear glasses. it’s not replacing anything, it’s going to be in addition to what i have. with google glass i’m going to have two ways to take pictures, two ways to see if i have any new messages, two ways to do x. it may do some things better than my phone, but it isn’t replacing my phone. if it replaced my watch, however, that would be a different story. it’s easy to add a lot of value veyond telling time, and i think i’m ready for a new watch anyways. post a comment | 59 references | share article email article | print article permalink tuesday jun 04 2013 your first pitch deck tuesday, june 4, 2013 at 3:29pm philip cortes if you're fundraising for the first time, here's a brain dump of what i learned raising our round for meeteor, and working with two

URL analysis for philipcortes.com

http://philipcortes.com/philcosblog/tag/fat-startups
http://philipcortes.com/philcosblog/?currentpage=9
http://philipcortes.com/philcosblog/2013/6/4/your-first-pitch-deck.html#comments
http://philipcortes.com/philcosblog/?currentpage=3
http://philipcortes.com/philcosblog/recommend/33773372
http://philipcortes.com/philcosblog/2013/6/26/hey-orderahead-heres-an-idea.html#comments
http://philipcortes.com/philcosblog/?currentpage=4
http://philipcortes.com/philcosblog/2013/5/29/fundraising-makes-you-fat.html?printerfriendly=true
http://philipcortes.com/philcosblog/tag/seed-round
http://philipcortes.com/philcosblog/2013/6/3/closing-your-round-product-to-market-fit.html#references
http://philipcortes.com/philcosblog/2013/5/29/fundraising-makes-you-fat.html#references
http://philipcortes.com/philcosblog/tag/orderahead
http://philipcortes.com/philcosblog/tag/process
http://philipcortes.com/philcosblog/2013/6/3/closing-your-round-product-to-market-fit.html?printerfriendly=true
http://philipcortes.com/philcosblog/2013/5/29/fundraising-makes-you-fat.html#comments

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

Domain Name: PHILIPCORTES.COM
Registry Domain ID: 1701839184_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.godaddy.com
Registrar URL: http://www.godaddy.com
Updated Date: 2018-02-13T15:24:27Z
Creation Date: 2012-02-12T19:29:58Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2019-02-12T19:29:58Z
Registrar: GoDaddy.com, LLC
Registrar IANA ID: 146
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: [email protected]
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: 480-624-2505
Domain Status: clientDeleteProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientDeleteProhibited
Domain Status: clientRenewProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientRenewProhibited
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Domain Status: clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited
Name Server: NS55.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
Name Server: NS56.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of whois database: 2019-01-26T18:54:44Z <<<

For more information on Whois status codes, please visit https://icann.org/epp

NOTICE: The expiration date displayed in this record is the date the
registrar's sponsorship of the domain name registration in the registry is
currently set to expire. This date does not necessarily reflect the expiration
date of the domain name registrant's agreement with the sponsoring
registrar. Users may consult the sponsoring registrar's Whois database to
view the registrar's reported date of expiration for this registration.

TERMS OF USE: You are not authorized to access or query our Whois
database through the use of electronic processes that are high-volume and
automated except as reasonably necessary to register domain names or
modify existing registrations; the Data in VeriSign Global Registry
Services' ("VeriSign") Whois database is provided by VeriSign for
information purposes only, and to assist persons in obtaining information
about or related to a domain name registration record. VeriSign does not
guarantee its accuracy. By submitting a Whois query, you agree to abide
by the following terms of use: You agree that you may use this Data only
for lawful purposes and that under no circumstances will you use this Data
to: (1) allow, enable, or otherwise support the transmission of mass
unsolicited, commercial advertising or solicitations via e-mail, telephone,
or facsimile; or (2) enable high volume, automated, electronic processes
that apply to VeriSign (or its computer systems). The compilation,
repackaging, dissemination or other use of this Data is expressly
prohibited without the prior written consent of VeriSign. You agree not to
use electronic processes that are automated and high-volume to access or
query the Whois database except as reasonably necessary to register
domain names or modify existing registrations. VeriSign reserves the right
to restrict your access to the Whois database in its sole discretion to ensure
operational stability. VeriSign may restrict or terminate your access to the
Whois database for failure to abide by these terms of use. VeriSign
reserves the right to modify these terms at any time.

The Registry database contains ONLY .COM, .NET, .EDU domains and
Registrars.

  REGISTRAR GoDaddy.com, LLC

SERVERS

  SERVER com.whois-servers.net

  ARGS domain =philipcortes.com

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

DOMAIN

  NAME philipcortes.com

  CHANGED 2018-02-13

  CREATED 2012-02-12

STATUS
clientDeleteProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientDeleteProhibited
clientRenewProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientRenewProhibited
clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited

NSERVER

  NS55.DOMAINCONTROL.COM 97.74.107.28

  NS56.DOMAINCONTROL.COM 173.201.75.28

  REGISTERED yes

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .